Advancing Near-Infrared Probes for Enhanced Breast Cancer Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, emphasizing the critical need for early detection and monitoring techniques. Conventional imaging modalities such as mammography, MRI, and ultrasound have face sensitivity, specificity, cost, and patient comfort limitations. This study introduces a handheld Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Tomography (NIR DOT) probe for breast cancer imaging. The NIRscan probe utilizes multi-wavelength light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and a linear charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor to acquire real-time optical data, reconstructing cross-sectional images of breast tissue based on scattering and absorption coefficients. With wavelengths optimized for the differential optical properties of tissue components, the probe enables functional imaging, distinguishing between healthy and malignant tissues. Clinical evaluations have demonstrated its potential for precise tumor localization and monitoring therapeutic responses, achieving a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 84.2%. By incorporating machine learning algorithms and a modified diffusion equation (MDE), the system enhances the accuracy and speed of image reconstruction, supporting rapid, non-invasive diagnostics. This development represents a significant step forward in portable, cost-effective solutions for breast cancer detection, with potential applications in low-resource settings and diverse clinical environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".