MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407194526 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2025.102398

An acidic residue within the OCT4 dimerization interface of SOX17 is necessary and sufficient to overcome its pluripotency-inducing activity

2025· article· en· W4407194526 on OpenAlexaff
Sik Yin Ho, Haoqing Hu, Derek Hoi Hang Ho, Allan Patrick Stéphane Renom, SC Yeung, Freya Boerner, Mingxi Weng, Andrew P. Hutchins, Ralf Jauch

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersGlaucoma Research FoundationCornell Center for Materials ResearchInnovation and Technology Commission - Hong KongInnovation and Technology CommissionHealth and Medical Research FundChoroideremia Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyResidue (chemistry)Interface (matter)Cell biologyComputational biologyBiochemistryBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SOX17 directs the differentiation toward endoderm and acts as a human germline specifier. We previously found that the replacement of glutamate at position 57 of the high-mobility group (HMG) box with the basic lysine residue in SOX2 alters interactions with OCT4 and turns SOX17 into a pluripotency factor. Here, we systematically interrogated how mutations at this critical position affect the cellular reprogramming activity of SOX17 in mouse and human. We found that most mutations turn SOX17 into a pluripotency factor regardless of their biophysical properties except for acidic residues and proline. The conservative mutation to an aspartate allows the SOX17E57D protein to maintain a self-renewing endodermal state. We showed that only the glutamate in the wild-type protein blocks the formation of an SOX17/OCT4 dimer at composite DNA elements in pluripotency enhancers. Insights into how modifications of an ultra-conserved residue affect functions of developmental transcription factors provide avenues to advance cell fate engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207