ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE: A UNIFIED COSMOLOGY AS AN ACTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO BIG BANG (III)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Singularity Big Bang (SBB) conjecture has not resulted in a satisfactory cosmology model. Instead the Thermal and Particle Diffusion Wave (TPDW) hypothesis' ontology explains the universe's cosmogony and continuous maintenance without any reliance on SBB properties or processes. The unrelated TPDW model is autonomous, resolving long-standing SBB difficulties. A key principle depends on interactions between ensembles of multiple quantum systems located in the pre-universe, that is, the massless pre-particles. Cosmogony is a continuous process occurring at the boundary between the observable universe and the non-observable pre-universe. Two existing, independent observations support the TPDW model for the masses of Standard Model (SM) particles and the temperature stability of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR). The TPDW model predicts, concomitantly with SM particle formation, the appearance of sub-models for universe time and gravity. It suggests the nature, and mechanism of, dark matter and dark energy origin, and quantum entanglement. A common mechanism is founded on interactions between diffusion waves, forming a steady state non-equilibrium throughout the universe. This environment leads to the formation of SM particles' mass, CMBR, gravity and universe time. TPDW anticipates the fundamentals of dark matter and dark energy, and quantum
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".