MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407204588 · doi:10.1007/s00701-025-06443-5

50 years of methylprednisolone application in spinal cord injury: a bibliometric analysis

2025· review· en· W4407204588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mi Zhou, Zhengyu Xu, Lei Feng, Hao Zhong, Hongjiang Yang, Guangzhi Ning, Shiqing Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neurochirurgica · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineNeuroradiologyInterventional radiologyMethylprednisoloneNeurosurgeryNeurologySpinal cord injurySpinal cordSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Methylprednisolone (MP) is a synthetic glucocorticoid known for its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, yet its application in global spinal cord injury (SCI) research has not been thoroughly summarized. This study aims to assess the current status and trends of methylprednisolone research in SCI, providing insights for future scholarly work. METHODS: Articles on methylprednisolone in SCI published from 1975 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. Metrics such as publication counts, H-index values, and data on countries, institutions, authors, and journals were analyzed. Co-citation, collaboration, and co-occurrence analyses of keywords were performed using CiteSpace. RESULTS: A total of 1,651 articles were identified, and publication numbers showed a consistent annual increase. The United States and Canada led in publication counts, H-index values, and citations, with the University of Toronto and the Veterans Health Administration being significant contributors. Bracken M.B. was the leading author. The most frequent keywords included 'trauma,' 'lipid peroxidation,' 'dose response,' 'ischemia,' and 'methylprednisolone.' A co-occurrence analysis classified 225 keywords into three clusters, highlighting key research areas in SCI. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer valuable insights into authors, countries, institutions, keywords, and research hotspots in SCI over the past 50 years, guiding future research directions in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.1660.316
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa NeurochirurgicaSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207