MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407205306 · doi:10.1016/j.afres.2025.100747

Effects of 0–12% soy proteins (four texturized and one isolate) on a lean hybrid meat system: cooking loss, texture, dynamic rheology, microstructure, and T2 NMR

2025· article· en· W4407205306 on OpenAlexafffund
Weilun Lin, Shai Barbut

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Food Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Ministry of Food and AgricultureOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsRheologyMicrostructureFood scienceTexture (cosmology)Soy proteinMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialComputer scienceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• SPI and four TSPs were evaluated in a lean meat system. • Increasing soy protein inclusion decreased cooking loss and increased hardness. • SPI increased the final storage modulus G'. • TSPs reduced the T 2 NMR relaxation time more than SPI. • Small-size TSP caused discontinuities in the meat matrix at 12 % inclusion. Meat and plant hybrid products have recently emerged as part of the global plant-forward movement. Soy proteins have been used at low levels (2–3 %), in meat products since the 1960s, mainly to enhance yield and sensory characteristics. This study assessed the structure-function relationship in products containing 0–12 % soy protein isolate (SPI) and four texturized soy proteins (TSPs: TA, TB, TC, and TD). Soy proteins significantly reduced cooking loss and increased hardness compared to the control (CL, no soy), with these effects intensifying as inclusion levels increased. At 12 %, TD resulted in lower hardness than the other soy proteins. Dynamic rheology revealed that at 6% inclusion, SPI increased the final storage modulus (G') compared to the CL, whereas TA, TB, and TC decreased it. The TD treatment exhibited a final G' similar to CL. Micrographs showed that 12 % TB (smallest texturized soy particles) caused discontinuity in the meat matrix, while TD (largest particles) confined meat components within its structure. T 2 NMR profiles revealed that all soy proteins restricted the water mobility of the meat batters, with TSPs showing a more pronounced effect than SPI. The relative order of T 21 values of cooked meat batters aligns with the cooking loss results. Overall, TSPs showed superior water binding to SPI. In this study, the larger size of TSPs likely had a favorable effect on their binding to the meat matrix at the high inclusion level (12 %). These findings provide insights into the selection of soy proteins for hybrid meat production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Food ResearchSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207