MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407211756 · doi:10.33774/apsa-2025-9h2n3

Indigenizing the Curriculum in the Classroom: A Modest ‘How to’ Blueprint

2025· preprint· en· W4407211756 on OpenAlexaff
Spyridon Kotsovilis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlueprintCurriculumRepertoireAction (physics)Plan (archaeology)Mathematics educationPoliticsPedagogySociologyComputer scienceEngineering ethicsPolitical sciencePsychologyEngineeringGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a modest ‘how to’ guide for Political Science educators with a series of recommendations across a range of curricular, pedagogical, research and professional development categories expanding from the classroom outwards. Besides proposing new and incorporating existing suggestions, this is meant as a repertoire that classifies, structures, and illustrates them with examples in ways that can render them tangible steps of an action plan that one can pursue systematically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207