MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TQGDNet: Coronary artery calcium deposit detection on computed tomography

2025· article· en· W4407216978 on OpenAlexaff
Wei-Chien Wang, Christopher Yu, Shahab Pathan, Kazuaki Negishi, Jinman Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronary artery calciumComputed tomographyCalciumComputer scienceRadiologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a leading global cause of cardiovascular related mortality. The scoring of coronary artery calcium (CAC) using computer tomography (CT) images is a diagnostic instrument for evaluating the risk of asymptomatic individuals prone to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. State-of-the-art automated CAC scoring methods rely on large annotated datasets to train convolutional neural network (CNN) models. However, these methods do not integrate features across different levels and layers of the CNN, particularly in the lower layers where important information regarding small calcium regions are present. In this study, we propose a new CNN model specifically designed to effectively capture features associated with small regions and their surrounding areas in low-contrast CT images. Our model integrates a specifically designed low-contrast detection module and two fusion modules focusing on the lower layers of the network to connect more deeper and wider neurons (or nodes) across multiple adjacent levels. Our first module, called ThrConvs, includes three convolution blocks tailored to detecting objects in images characterized by low contrast. Following this, two fusion modules are introduced: (i) Queen-fusion (Qf), which introduces a cross-scale feature method to fuse features from multiple adjacent levels and layers and, (ii) lower-layer Gather-and-Distribute (GD) module, which focuses on learning comprehensive features associated with small-sized calcium deposits and their surroundings. We demonstrate superior performance of our model using the public OrCaScore dataset, encompassing 269 calcium deposits, surpassing the capabilities of previous state-of-the-art works. We demonstrate the enhanced performance of our approach, achieving a notable 2.3-3.6 % improvement in mean Pixel Accuracy (mPA) on both the private Concord dataset and the public OrCaScore dataset, surpassing the capabilities of established detection methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputerized Medical Imaging and GraphicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207