Tally: Non-Intrusive Performance Isolation for Concurrent Deep Learning Workloads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GPU underutilization is a significant concern in many production deep learning clusters, leading to prolonged job queues and increased operational expenses. A promising solution to this inefficiency is GPU sharing, which improves resource utilization by allowing multiple workloads to execute concurrently on a single GPU. However, deploying GPU sharing in production settings faces critical obstacles due to the limitations of existing mechanisms, including high integration costs, inadequate performance isolation, and limited application compatibility. To address these issues, we introduce Tally, a non-intrusive GPU sharing mechanism that provides robust performance isolation and comprehensive workload compatibility. The key to Tally's robust performance isolation capability lies in its fine-grained thread-block-level GPU kernel scheduling strategy, which allows the system to effectively mitigate interference caused by workload co-execution. We evaluate Tally on a diverse range of workloads and show that it incurs an average overhead of only 7.2% on the 99th-percentile latency of high-priority inference tasks when executed concurrently with best-effort training workloads, compared to 188.9% overhead exhibited by the state-of-the-art GPU sharing systems like TGS, while achieving over 80% of TGS's system throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".