MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407226089 · doi:10.31083/0003-925x-63-121

Effect of individual quarter milking withperiodic air intake on free fatty acids (FFA)in the milk of dairy cows

2012· article· en· W4407226089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Rose-Meierhöfer, Susanne Demba, Christian Ammon, Hülya Öz, Sabrina Elsholz, Gundula Hoffmann, Reiner Brunsch

Bibliographic record

VenueArchiv für Lebensmittelhygiene · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilkingFood scienceMilk fatDairy cattleAnimal scienceChemistryAutomatic milkingQuarter (Canadian coin)BiologyLactationPregnancyIce calving

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free fatty acids (FFA) reduce the quality of milk and dairy products by generating a rancid and soapy taste. They are produced by the spontaneous or induced enzymatic hydrolysis of milk fat. Induced lipolysis has its origin in the mechanical stresses produced in milk by pumping the milk, and by the milking process itself. In this study, the effect of the milking system, specifically MultiLactor®, on the resulting concentration of FFA was examined.The MultiLactor® is an individual quarter-milking system with periodic air intake and sequential pulsation, designed to be used in conventional milking parlours.The experimental design included testing 40 milk samples at two different flow rates. It was found that milking with the MultiLactor® caused an increase in the concentration of FFA in fresh milk. The FFA increase was higher for a flow rate of 1 l/min compared with a flow rate of 3 l/min. Based on the data obtained, the MultiLactor® generates no higher increase in FFA than that found when using other milking systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchiv für LebensmittelhygieneSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207