MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deconstructing Complex Abstraction Through Context in Science Education: Comprehensive Review on Research Development, Approaches, and Articulation

2025· article· en· W4407236481 on OpenAlexaff
Micheal Obakhavbaye

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œBarcelona Conference on Education official conference proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityFraser InstituteFraser HealthUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArticulation (sociology)AbstractionContext (archaeology)Computer scienceCognitive scienceData scienceEngineering ethicsEpistemologyPsychologyEngineeringPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been significant attention on context-based learning in science education in recent times, challenging conventional paradigms and fostering more inclusive and authentic learning experiences. However, research has shown that there are no simplified definitions of context, and without proper articulation, context becomes anything and everything. Evidence of what context is in science education has

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.336
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œBarcelona Conference on Education official conference proceedingsSame topicScience Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207