MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407243673 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04727

Enhancing CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Via Fast Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of the CALF-20 Metal–Organic Framework

2025· article· en· W4407243673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. Pereira, Mariana Sardo, Ricardo Vieira, Ildefonso Marín-Montesinos, Luís Mafra

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorCentro de Investigação em Materiais Cerâmicos e CompósitosEuropean Commission
KeywordsChemistryMetal-organic frameworkMicrowaveMetalEnvironmental chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising porous materials for CO 2 adsorption due to their high surface area, tunable properties, and selective adsorption capabilities. The recently reported Calgary Framework 20 (CALF-20) MOF has very appealing CO 2 capture properties: high uptake capacity; low regeneration energy; durability (>450 000 cycles) under steam and wet acid gases; simple and scalable synthesis. This study investigates the microwave (MW)-assisted synthesis of CALF-20, which reduces reaction time 12-fold while enhancing the synthesis yield to 97%. Structural analysis confirmed that MW-synthesized CALF-20 retains its crystallographic structure and shows improved CO 2 capture performance, exhibiting higher adsorption capacity (∼20% higher), selectivity, and lower regeneration energy. This method provides a rapid and efficient alternative for producing the CALF-20 adsorbent for CO 2 capture and separation applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207