MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407247587 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3539681

Adaptive-Grained Exponential Integrator Algorithm for Efficient Simulation of Power Converter Systems

2025· article· en· W4407247587 on OpenAlexafffund
Jared Paull, Carl Knickle, Nicole Lofroth

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)Okanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIntegratorExponential functionElectric power systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmVoltageMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation is increasingly important for complex power electronic converter system design and validation. This paper proposes an adaptive-grained exponential integrator (AGEI) algorithm designed to efficiently simulate power electronic networks. The AGEI algorithm relies on precomputation of carefully-chosen discretization steps to reduce memory burden. It then performs sequential intermediate integrations between discrete switching events to accelerate transient simulation. The variable time-step, high-order integration algorithm finds a balance between simulation run-time and computational overhead. The AGEI algorithm varies the number of the forcing function terms to meet desirable error thresholds. The proposed algorithm is L-stable and can be flexibly applied to stiff and non-stiff circuit systems, rendering it suitable for a wide arrange of power converter topologies and parameters. A hardware experimental study validates the AGEI algorithm's accuracy while simulation case studies demonstrate the AGEI algorithm significantly improves numerical efficiency. It is shown in the typical converter case studies that the proposed algorithm enables more than 8-fold and 3-fold simulation speedup compared to popular simulation tools, i.e., Simulink and PLECS, respectively. The numerical efficiency gains of the proposed algorithm become more apparent for power converter circuits with only-DC input sources or stiff circuit systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207