MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Image Compression for Communication: Topic Modelling of Scopus Abstracts Using BERTopic

2024· article· en· W4407248099 on OpenAlexaff
Chanambam Mokaju Meitei, Sanju Dabas, Ashok Kumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusComputer scienceInformation retrievalImage compressionCompression (physics)Data compressionImage (mathematics)Natural language processingArtificial intelligenceData scienceImage processingMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of increasing digital data generation and utilization, efficient data compression is increasingly crucial, particularly in the realm of image and video communication. Visual content continues to be extremely important in digital platforms such as social media, streaming services, video conferencing, and medical images. Management of the substantial daily data flow poses significant challenges for storage, transmission, and real-time processing. Due to their inherently large size, image and video files necessitate effective compression techniques to optimize bandwidth usage, reduce storage requirements, and facilitate the seamless delivery of content across diverse communication networks. In this study, we utilized AI based topic modeling using BERTopic for a review of $\mathbf{5 0, 2 6 1}$ Scopus abstracts published from 1972 to mid-2024 to investigate dominant topics of research done on image data compression. The variability in the results of the BERTopic model is observed in multiple runs on same model parameters and is taken care of by taking 10 runs and keeping stable topics that are found in multiple runs. The overall topics of all the experiments are finalized into 10 major topics, namely, image compression, watermark encryption and security, MIMO (multiple input multiple output) channels system, video compression, deep neural networks for image compression, saliency detection, medical PCS system, satellite broadcasting and holograms in communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207