MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La création des places publiques urbaines féministes

2025· article· fr· W4407248563 on OpenAlex
Charmain Lévy, Sylvie Paré

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Récemment, certaines villes ont créé des places publiques qui reconnaissent la contribution des femmes à la société moderne et dans certains cas, l'urbanisme féministe est devenu un champ d'action. Cet article analyse deux cas de places publiques dédiées aux féministes : la Place des Montréalaises à Montréal et la Place des Pionnières à Montevideo. La première est un grand projet en cours de développement. Sa construction est prévue sur un viaduc d'autoroute situé entre le Vieux-Montréal et le centre-ville. À Montevideo, l'administration progressiste a décidé en 2017 de créer une place publique dédiée aux féministes. Nous examinons les négociations derrière ces projets urbains, la dynamique entre les parties prenantes et ce que cet espace public signifie pour elles. Ancrées dans une approche féministe et intersectionnelle, nous montrons comment la mobilisation et la coordination des femmes de la société civile avec les fémocrates municipaux et les professionnels jouent un rôle important dans les dynamiques de pouvoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it