Bibliographic record
Abstract
Récemment, certaines villes ont créé des places publiques qui reconnaissent la contribution des femmes à la société moderne et dans certains cas, l'urbanisme féministe est devenu un champ d'action. Cet article analyse deux cas de places publiques dédiées aux féministes : la Place des Montréalaises à Montréal et la Place des Pionnières à Montevideo. La première est un grand projet en cours de développement. Sa construction est prévue sur un viaduc d'autoroute situé entre le Vieux-Montréal et le centre-ville. À Montevideo, l'administration progressiste a décidé en 2017 de créer une place publique dédiée aux féministes. Nous examinons les négociations derrière ces projets urbains, la dynamique entre les parties prenantes et ce que cet espace public signifie pour elles. Ancrées dans une approche féministe et intersectionnelle, nous montrons comment la mobilisation et la coordination des femmes de la société civile avec les fémocrates municipaux et les professionnels jouent un rôle important dans les dynamiques de pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".