Episodic rhythmicity is generated by a distributed neural network in the developing mammalian spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spinal circuits generate locomotor rhythms, but the mechanisms behind episodic locomotor behaviors remain unclear. This study investigated dopamine-induced episodic rhythms in isolated neonatal mouse spinal cords to understand these mechanisms. The episodic rhythms were generally synchronous and propagated rostro-caudally, although occasional asynchrony was observed. Electrical stimulation of the L5 dorsal root entrained the episodic rhythms, suggesting afferent control and a distributed network. Even after transection or ventrolateral funiculus (VLF) lesions, episodic activity persisted in isolated thoracic or sacral segments, implying VLF-coupled networks. Rhythmicity was observed in VLF and dorsal root axons and was independent of cholinergic excitation via motoneurons, GABA A receptors, or dorsal inhibitory circuits. These findings suggest a flexibly coupled, distributed spinal interneuron network underlies episodic rhythmicity, providing a foundation for future investigations into how spinal circuits are modulated to produce diverse motor outputs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".