Unlocking High‐Performance in All‐Organic Solar Cells by the Development of Organic Electrodes with No Acid and High‐Temperature Treatment and the Effective Preparation Thereof on Organic Multilayer Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Solar panels are difficult to dispose of and environmentally unfriendly because they contain potentially hazardous compounds and materials that are difficult to dispose of or recycle. As such, all‐organic solar cells (AOSCs), which comprise only organic materials, have received considerable attention as environmentally friendly alternatives. Although the use of AOSCs will resolve the issue of solar cell disposal, the production of high‐performance AOSCs remains a challenge (power conversion efficiency (PCE) currently ≈4%) because organic electrodes exhibit limited conductivity and are difficult to fabricate without damaging organic plastic substrates and multilayered organic semiconducting materials. Herein the development of AOSCs is reported with PCEs more than twice those of previously reported AOSCs on PET substrates (8.7%). The key to achieving this is the development of organic electrodes with high conductivity and which require no acid doping or high‐temperature heating, thus avoiding damage to the plastic substrates. Moreover, the top‐electrode lamination method developed herein, which does not damage the bottom organic layers of AOSCs, also contributes to the production of high‐performance AOSCs. In addition, the use of bioplastic substrates is explored to demonstrate the feasibility of producing environmentally friendly solar cells with good photovoltaic performance (PCE: 8.6%), thus suggesting that the electrodes and lamination method developed are effective for producing high‐performance AOSCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".