MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407262677 · doi:10.1111/eva.70078

Genetic Architecture Underlying Response to the Fungal Pathogen <i>Dothistroma septosporum</i> in Lodgepole Pine, Jack Pine, and Their Hybrids

2025· article· en· W4407262677 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mengmeng Lu, Nicolas Feau, Brandon M. Lind, Dragana Obreht Vidaković, Pooja Singh, Sally N. Aitken, Richard C. Hamelin, Sam Yeaman

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolutionary Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome AlbertaGénome QuébecAlberta InnovatesGenome British ColumbiaGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyHybridJack pineFungal pathogenTree breedingPinus contortaBotanyWoody plantGenetic architectureMountain pine beetleEcologyPathogenPinus <genus>GeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In recent decades, Dothistroma needle blight (DNB), a pine tree disease caused by the fungal pathogen Dothistroma septosporum, has severely damaged lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud.) in British Columbia, Canada, and raised health concerns for jack pine ( Pinus banksiana Lamb.). The pathogen has already shown signs of host shift eastward to the hybrid populations between lodgepole pine and jack pine ( Pinus contorta × P. banksiana ), and possibly into pure jack pine. However, we have little knowledge about mechanisms of resistance to D . septosporum , especially the underlying genetic basis of variation in pines. In this study, we conducted controlled inoculations to induce infection by D. septosporum and performed a genome‐wide case–control association study with pooled sequencing (pool‐seq) data to dissect the genetic architecture underlying response in lodgepole pine, jack pine, and their hybrids. We identified candidate genes associated with D. septosporum response in lodgepole pine and in hybrid samples. We also assessed genetic structure in hybrid populations and inferred how introgression may affect the distribution of genetic variation involved in D. septosporum response in the studied samples. These results can be used to develop genomic tools to evaluate DNB risk, guide forest management strategies, and potentially select for resistant genotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionary ApplicationsSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207