MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407266268 · doi:10.71043/sci.v35i.2255

Camels, Soldiers, and Pilgrims in Sixth Century Nessana

2020· article· en· W4407266268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScripta classica Israelica · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAncient historyHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, Conor Whately takes a closer look at two papyri from Nessana, P. Ness. 3.35 and 37, which detail aspects of the presence of camels in the village. These papyri have been used to argue for the presence of camel-riders among the resident soldiers. Previous scholarship had identified two species of camel at Nessana, the dromedary and the Bactrian on the basis of the Greek words used in P. Ness. 3.35, δρομεδάριος, and κάμηλος. Whately argues that the first term means camel-rider, dromedarius, while the second means camel. The presence of documents like this papyrus (P. Ness. 3.35) reveals the close workings of soldiers and civilians at the frontier site, with one of the principal duties being to provide pilgrims to the Holy Land with sufficient security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it