Current and future research in environmental sustainability: Synthesise of the role, responsibilities, and opportunities for the business sector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental sustainability is a timely and important topic to investigate given the increasingly complex challenges requiring businesses to reevaluate their business models in relationships with the natural environment, including their roles and responsibilities, and how opportunities in addressing these challenges may be utilized. This special issue enhances contemporary and future research by soliciting a wide variety of themes from ten papers falling under the scope of an ecological and climate focus of environmental sustainability relevant to the roles, responsibilities, and opportunities for the business sector, while also considering the links between environmental and social aspects. The articles included in the special issue provide an overview of five topics. These are 1) sub-national greenhouse gas accounting approaches, 2) corporate governance, policies, and practices, 3) sustainable finance, 4) consumer viewpoints and expectations, and 5) bioeconomy. Moreover, the crosscutting themes discussed suggest an inter- and transdisciplinary nature of environmental sustainability. In this introductory article to the special issue, the ten articles bring forth national and institutional levels, the sub-national level, and the organizational level. To conclude, future research avenues are vast based on suggestions presented in the ten papers the special issue covers. However, this introductory article also brings up topics suggested in the initial call for papers but were not covered in the papers included in the special issue, thus still relevant for future studies. • This special issue comprises ten papers by 57 authors coming from 15 countries. • The papers in this special issue studied various sectors and offer practical implications. • Six theoretical approaches are used in the published papers. • There is still vast room for future studies in the field of environmental sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".