MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407268455 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2025.3539908

Deep Unrolled Graph Laplacian Regularization for Robust Time-of-Flight Depth Denoising

2025· article· en· W4407268455 on OpenAlexaff
Jingwei Jia, Gene Cheung, Jin Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersShanghai Rising-Star ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRegularization (linguistics)Noise reductionLaplacian matrixLaplace operatorArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage denoisingGraphAlgorithmMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depth images captured by Time-of-Flight (ToF) sensors are subject to severe noise. Recent approaches based on deep neural networks achieve good depth denoising performance in synthetic data, but the application to real-world data is limited, due to the complexity of actual depth noise characteristics and the difficulty in acquiring ground truth. In this paper, we propose a novel ToF depth denoising network based on unrolled graph Laplacian regularization to “robustify” the network against both noise complexity and dataset deficiency. Unlike previous schemes that are ignorant of underlying ToF imaging mechanism, we formulate a fidelity term in the optimization problem to adapt to the depth probabilistic distribution with spatially-varying noise variance. Then, we add quadratic graph Laplacian regularization as the smoothness prior, leading to a maximum a posteriori problem that is optimized efficiently by solving a linear system of equations. We unroll the solution into iterative filters so that parameters used in the optimization and graph construction are amendable to data-driven tuning. Because the resulting network is built using domain knowledge of ToF imaging principle and graph prior, it is robust against overfitting to synthetic training data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposal outperforms existing schemes in ToF depth denoising on synthetic FLAT dataset and generalizes well to real Kinectv2 dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207