MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407274546 · doi:10.1080/01490400.2025.2456676

Parting Thoughts XLVI: Paws and Reflect: The Role of Strays in Istanbul’s Cultural Life

2025· article· en· W4407274546 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Kuzuoglu

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAestheticsPsychologySociologyArtCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay reflects on the role of stray animals in the metropolitan city of Istanbul where stray dogs and cats are an inseparable ­element of public life. Unsurprisingly, a recently passed legislation that might potentially to lead to the demise of strays from the public realm received a significant social resistance. In a leisure context, paying attention to urban inhabitants’ interactions with strays, as it relates to placemaking in our cities and as an identity marker for neighbourhoods, the essay calls for a holistic consideration to Istanbul’s public life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeisure SciencesSame topicCultural and Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207