MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407278057 · doi:10.62787/mhm.v2i2.69

Attention

2024· article· en· W4407278057 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Medicine Humanity and Media · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The core concept in this issue's seven papers is "attention", which is crucial for quality health communication research. The authors examine various aspects of health communication during the pandemic, providing valuable insights and strategies for the future. Drawing from the concept of "fine processing", the editors advocate refining the experiences and knowledge gained to continuously improve our understanding of "medicine, humanity, and media" (MHM), ensuring that these hard-earned lessons are not forgotten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0090.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Medicine Humanity and MediaSame topicMedia Influence and HealthFrench-language works237,207