MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407284971 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.061

A61 GLOBAL INCIDENCE OF APPENDICITIS: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

2025· article· en· W4407284971 on OpenAlexaff
E Buie, Stephanie Coward, Michael Buie, James A. King, Linda M. Wilson, May Lynn Quan, T Gimon, Gilaad G. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)AppendicitisPopulationBusinessOperations managementMedicineGeneral surgeryEnvironmental healthEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The global incidence of appendicitis in 2019 was estimated at 228 per 100,000 person-years. However, temporal trends of appendicitis rates vary between early industrialized and newly industrialized regions. Aims To analyze annual appendectomy rates in regions of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the 21st century. Methods We conducted an observational population-based cohort study using data from 34 OECD regions from 2000–2023. OECD data provides country-level annual hospitalization rates for appendectomy per 100,000 person-years. We used Poisson regression to calculate Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) in appendectomy rates, with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each region. CIs crossing 0% were defined as stable. Results We observed geographic variation in appendectomy incidence rates, with rates ranging from 56.8 per 100,000 in Portugal (2023) to 165.6 per 100,000 in Switzerland (2022) (Table 1). Appendectomy rates significantly decreased in 22 regions and significantly increased in 10 regions, with AAPCs ranging from −4.25% (95%CI: −4.28, −4.22) in Italy to 1.46% (95%CI: 1.23, 1.68) in Norway (Table 1). AAPCs in Iceland were stable, and Latvia had insufficient data for time trend analysis. Conclusions In the 21st century, time trends of appendectomy rates across OECD regions displayed variation, with the majority decreasing. Geographic variability in rates and trends over time may be due to factors such as differential access to improved diagnostic imaging and non-surgical treatments. Table 1. The Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) in appendectomy for the 34 regions of the OECD dataset with the corresponding year ranges for each region, confidence intervals, and associated average incidence per 100,000 person-years. All region AAPCs are significantly increasing or decreasing except Iceland and Latvia. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207