MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285074 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.105

A105 TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD THROUGH COACHING AND EMPOWERMENT (TRACE): A FEASIBILITY RCT

2025· article· en· W4407285074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCoaching Methods and Impact
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingRandomized controlled trialEmpowermentTRACE (psycholinguistics)PsychologyMedicinePsychotherapistPolitical scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pediatric patients with chronic disease face challenges during the transition to adult care, including psychosocial and emotional stressors, as well as worsening disease. Aims Transition to Adulthood through Coaching and Empowerment (TRACE) assessed the feasibility of conducting a virtual transition coaching randomized controlled trial for adolescent patients and collected preliminary clinical outcomes. Methods Individuals aged 16-17 diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease or juvenile idiopathic arthritis from the pediatric gastroenterology (GI) or rheumatology clinics at McMaster Children’s Hospital were recruited. Participants were randomized into control or Transition Coach Intervention (TCI) groups. TCI participants received 8 virtual coaching sessions; 6 with a child life specialist and 2 with a clinical psychologist. Electronic questionnaires were completed at baseline, 8 months, and 11 months. Feasibility outcomes, patient demographics, transition readiness, and quality of life were recorded. Descriptive statistics summarized feasibility outcomes and outcomes by group. Results Of all participants (n=27), 67% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 16.8 (0.5) years. The recruitment rate was 58% and 38% for the GI and rheumatology clinics, respectively. The overall dropout rate was 7%. All TCI participants attended at least 6/8 sessions, and 63% of participants had a complete data set (Table I). Figure 1 shows baseline and 8-month follow-up data for preliminary clinical outcomes, such as transition readiness and quality of life, which will inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial. Conclusions The TRACE study aims to show that a virtual TCI trial is feasible. Based on preliminary responses to this transition intervention, we plan to conduct a large-scale, randomized controlled trial. Table I: Feasibility outcomes. (n=14 control group, n=13 TCI group, n=27 total). JIA = juvenile idiopathic arthritis, IBD = inflammatory bowel disease, TCI = transition coach intervention Figure 1. Transition-Q and Peds-QL scores at baseline and 8-month follow-up. (n=13 for the control group, n=8 for the baseline TCI group; n=8 for the 8-month follow-up control group, and n=6 for the 8-month follow-up TCI group). F/U = follow-up, TCI = transition coach intervention Funding Agencies: HAHSO

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it