MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285074 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.105

A105 TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD THROUGH COACHING AND EMPOWERMENT (TRACE): A FEASIBILITY RCT

2025· article· en· W4407285074 on OpenAlexaff
Kayla Beaudoin, Heather McKean, Sheri A. Nsamenang, Kristen Bortolin, Tania Cellucci, Jenna Dowhaniuk, Liane Heale, Robert M. Issenman, Nikhil Pai, Mary Sherlock, Mary Zachos, Karen Beattie, Michelle Batthish, Katherine Prowse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCoaching Methods and Impact
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingRandomized controlled trialEmpowermentTRACE (psycholinguistics)PsychologyMedicinePsychotherapistPolitical scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pediatric patients with chronic disease face challenges during the transition to adult care, including psychosocial and emotional stressors, as well as worsening disease. Aims Transition to Adulthood through Coaching and Empowerment (TRACE) assessed the feasibility of conducting a virtual transition coaching randomized controlled trial for adolescent patients and collected preliminary clinical outcomes. Methods Individuals aged 16-17 diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease or juvenile idiopathic arthritis from the pediatric gastroenterology (GI) or rheumatology clinics at McMaster Children’s Hospital were recruited. Participants were randomized into control or Transition Coach Intervention (TCI) groups. TCI participants received 8 virtual coaching sessions; 6 with a child life specialist and 2 with a clinical psychologist. Electronic questionnaires were completed at baseline, 8 months, and 11 months. Feasibility outcomes, patient demographics, transition readiness, and quality of life were recorded. Descriptive statistics summarized feasibility outcomes and outcomes by group. Results Of all participants (n=27), 67% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 16.8 (0.5) years. The recruitment rate was 58% and 38% for the GI and rheumatology clinics, respectively. The overall dropout rate was 7%. All TCI participants attended at least 6/8 sessions, and 63% of participants had a complete data set (Table I). Figure 1 shows baseline and 8-month follow-up data for preliminary clinical outcomes, such as transition readiness and quality of life, which will inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial. Conclusions The TRACE study aims to show that a virtual TCI trial is feasible. Based on preliminary responses to this transition intervention, we plan to conduct a large-scale, randomized controlled trial. Table I: Feasibility outcomes. (n=14 control group, n=13 TCI group, n=27 total). JIA = juvenile idiopathic arthritis, IBD = inflammatory bowel disease, TCI = transition coach intervention Figure 1. Transition-Q and Peds-QL scores at baseline and 8-month follow-up. (n=13 for the control group, n=8 for the baseline TCI group; n=8 for the 8-month follow-up control group, and n=6 for the 8-month follow-up TCI group). F/U = follow-up, TCI = transition coach intervention Funding Agencies: HAHSO

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCoaching Methods and ImpactFrench-language works237,207