MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285238 · doi:10.36472/msd.v10i3.913

Intra-articular Synovial Sarcoma of the Knee with Extension to the Distal Thigh: A case report 

2023· article· en· W4407285238 on OpenAlexaff
Teodora Delibašic, Dušan Rnjak, Dragan Grbić

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Science and Discovery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSynovial sarcomaThighKnee JointSarcomaAnatomySurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We present a case of intra-articular synovial sarcoma of the knee with expansion to the distal thigh with developed metastatic lung disease. The case was complicated by the detection of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Case: A 70 year age woman reported pain in the right knee during a routine check–up. Ultrasound (US) finding was inconclusive since the detected intra–articular tumor, appeared to be a partially organised haematoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated the tumor corresponds to SS, and radical tumor resection was performed. Due to developed distant lung metastases, the patient received two different chemotherapy protocols. Good response to the second chemotherapy enabled video–assisted thoracoscopic surgery and removal of the remaining deposits in the left lung. Unexpected detection of primary adenocarcinoma of the lung and its metastases required a new chemotherapy protocol, which the patient is currently undergoing. Conclusion: SS's insidious onset and infrequency often delay the diagnosis. Common occurrences of lung metastases require the selection of adequate chemotherapy, and continuous follow – up. Laboratory and radiographic monitoring remain mandatory to ensure the absence of both primary diseases and to detect recurrent metastatic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Science and DiscoverySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207