MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285554 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.228

A228 PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS IN ADULTHOOD AND RISK OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2025· article· en· W4407285554 on OpenAlexaffabout
C Lanoix, Canisius Fantodji, Prévost Jantchou, Marie Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseMedicinePsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Few studies have assessed the possible etiological role of psychosocial factors on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We have previously reported that some childhood psychosocial factors were associated with increased odds of IBD in adulthood. Aims The aim of this study was to estimate the associations between self-reported psychosocial factors first experienced in adulthood and occurrence of IBD later in life. Methods This matched case-control study was nested within a cohort of individuals born in Quebec in 1970-1974. Cases were identified with validated algorithms based on health services from 1983 to 2014; their date of diagnosis was based on their first health service (index date). Only cases diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (CD) (n = 1041) or ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 511) at ≥18 years were included. Each case was individually matched with a control based on sex and birth year. Cases and controls completed a questionnaire documenting sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors up to the age corresponding to the index date. The psychosocial factors (n = 17) experienced in adulthood related to work (interruption, changes, problems), difficulties (academic, financial), judicial problems, marriage or union, divorce or separation (parents’/own), familial conflict, birth of a child, death (spouse or child/other loved one), depression, anxiety, accident, violence or abuse. Potential confounders were based on a priori knowledge. Conditional logistic regression was applied to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each psychosocial factor, for CD and UC separately. Multiple imputations were used to address missing data. Results Adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of CD were higher among those who had experienced changes in the workplace (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.96-2.61), marriage (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.06–1.64), divorce or separation (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.19-2.58), death of spouse or child (OR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.12-9.19), anxiety (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.25-3.78), and accident (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.09-2.73). The odds of UC were higher among those who had experienced problems at work (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.03-3.87) and anxiety (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.93 - 3.32) and lower among those exposed to changes in the workplace (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.23-1.00). The other psychosocial factors were not associated with either CD or UC. Conclusions Several psychosocial factors, first experienced in adulthood, were associated with increased odds of CD or UC later in life, whereas only one, changes in the workplace was associated with decreased odds of UC. Further research should consider the self-reported subjective impact of these psychosocial factors. Funding Agencies CIHRCanada Foundation for Innovation & the Québec Ministry of Education, Leisure and Sports (#12532), Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS, #16227), Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (#2435), Institut de la statistique du Québec

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207