MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285564 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.187

A187 VANCOMYCIN CAN INDUCE AND MAINTAIN REMISSION OF REFRACTORY INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS – A CASE SERIES

2025· article· en· W4407285564 on OpenAlexaff
Amber Cintosun, Naureen Narula

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)Inflammatory bowel diseasePrimary sclerosing cholangitisMedicineGastroenterologySeries (stratigraphy)VancomycinInternal medicineDiseaseBiologyStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The microbiome is suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Meta-analyses have shown a positive response for antimicrobials in IBD, although the results are difficult to apply clinically given the wide variability in antimicrobial modality and treatment regimen as well as perceived reduced effectiveness compared to advanced therapies. Fewer antimicrobial studies have been performed in the PSC population. There is some evidence that vancomycin may represent a treatment option with concurrent IBD and PSC. Aims To determine the clinical and endoscopic effect of vancomycin for patients with refractory PSC-IBD. Methods Retrospective chart review. Results We identified 6 patients (4 male) with IBD and PSC who were started on vancomycin (Figure 1). Four had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 2 had Crohn’s disease. Three had pre-existing cirrhosis; 1 of these patients had undergone liver transplantation for PSC. All had failed multiple therapies for IBD with up to 4 advanced therapies failed. One patient had previously required surgery for UC. Patients were started on induction vancomycin at 125 mg 4 times daily or BID (twice daily) for 8 weeks followed by maintenance therapy at 125 mg BID or daily. The initial response to vancomycin therapy was demonstrated for all 6 patients at early follow-up ranging from 1 to 3 months. All had improvement of clinical symptoms with reduction in stool frequency and improvement in consistency. Some had bloody stools, nocturnal symptoms, and abdominal pain, which also improved. One patient is awaiting post-vancomycin endoscopy. The remaining 5 started with moderate-to-severe inflammation and improved to mild or no inflammation on follow-up endoscopy 2 months to 2 years after starting vancomycin. Two patients had documented repeat endoscopy at a longer period of follow-up (4 and 6 years) and maintained remission. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 months to 6 years. No adverse effects to vancomycin were reported. None of the 6 patients required steroids, addition of alternative therapy, admission, or surgery. All patients were on concurrent therapy (vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or 5-ASA) either started prior to or at the same time as vancomycin. Three of these patients discontinued their ustekinumab at 6, 8, and 14 months respectively given treatment effectiveness and maintained remission on vancomycin alone. Conclusions In a subset of patients with PSC-IBD, vancomycin can induce clinical and mucosal remission for refractory IBD. We present two dosing regimens which produced rapid clinical improvement and those with longer follow-up sustained durable results. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207