MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407285576 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.192

A192 CHANGING TRENDS IN ARTHRITIS PREVALENCE AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: INSIGHTS FROM A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

2025· article· en· W4407285576 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eileen Crowley, E Kuenzig, J Widdifiled, Eric I. Benchimol, Minh Lam, Vipul Jairath, Sherry Rohekar, Laura E. Targownik, Melanie Watson, Roberta Berard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineArthritisDiseasePopulationInflammatory Bowel DiseasesDemographyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims The burden of arthritis among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is poorly understood. We describe changes over time in the annual prevalence of inflammatory arthritis (IA) and musculoskeletal (MSK)-related physician encounters among individuals with IBD. Methods We conducted a retrospective repeated cross-sectional study using Ontario population-based health administrative data. We used the Ontario Crohn’s and Colitis Cohort which comprises all IBD patients derived from health administrative data using validated age-specific case-identification algorithms. Individuals diagnosed with IBD between April 01, 2003, and March 31, 2020 (population denominator) were followed from their first IBD code (index date) until they died or were lost to follow-up (out-migrated/lost health care coverage), or until the end of available follow-up data (March 31, 2020). We identified the cumulative prevalence of inflammatory arthritis (≥1 hospitalization/ED encounter or ≥2 physician billing claims with IA-related diagnosis codes with ≥1 by a rheumatologist within 365 days). Separately we identified the annual number of individuals with ≥1 hospitalization/ED encounter/physician billing claim with any non-trauma related MSK-specific diagnosis codes. The annual age- and sex-standardized cumulative prevalence of both IA and MSK among individuals living with IBD each year were determined. Results Over the study period, the number of individuals living with IBD increased from 54,283 in 2003 to 108,857 in 2020; the number of children <18yrs increased from 1,547 to 2,667. Among all ages, the age/sex standardized cumulative IA prevalence within the IBD cohort increased from 6.8% (95% CI 6.5-7.2%) in 2003 to 15.2% (95%CI 15.0-15.8%) by 2020 (Figure 1). IA was slightly more common among those with Crohn’s than ulcerative colitis (17.4% vs 13.2%, respectively). By 2020, IA prevalence was 6.8% among children/youth <18yrs, 17.4% among those 18-64yrs, and 23.1% among those ≥65yrs. Overall, crude annual prevalence of an MSK-related encounter remained relatively stable from 30.6% in 2003 to 27.7% in 2020. Conclusions This study is the first to provide population-level estimates of IA and MSK-related conditions in people with IBD. The cumulative prevalence of IA among individuals with IBD has steadily increased over time, particularly among those ≥65years, while MSK-related encounters have not. This may be related to increased physician recognition of IA or increased access to care and diagnosis. These findings have implications for healthcare costs and utilization, given the specialized care and expertise required to manage IA in the context of complex, comorbid conditions like IBD. Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→