Gradual increase in energy intake over 8 weeks with voluntary wheel running limits body weight change in male rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The influence of appetite and energy intake (EI) on energy compensation in response to chronic exercise remains poorly understood. This study examined the temporal impact of habitual exercise on EI and the homeostatic appetite regulators that influence energy compensation. Twelve-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats (n 30) fed an AIN-93M diet were randomised into one of three groups: (1) sedentary control (SED); (2) voluntary wheel exercise (EX) and (3) sedentary, weight-matched to aerobic exercise (SED-WM) for 8 weeks. Measures of EI, body weight and adiposity were assessed. Appetite-regulating hormones acyl ghrelin, active glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, leptin and insulin were measured in response to an oral glucose tolerance test. Rats with running wheels completed an average of 192 km over 8 weeks. While EI was initially reduced in EX, EI gradually increased with exercise training after week 1 (P < 0·05). Body weight was lower in EX relative to SED from weeks 3 to 5 but did not differ at the end of the study. Fat mass and long-term satiety hormones leptin and insulin were lower in EX (P < 0·05). No differences were observed in concentrations of the satiety hormone active GLP-1 or the orexigenic hormone acyl ghrelin. Short-term homeostatic regulators of appetite do not appear to be altered with exercise training. The reduction in adiposity and associated decrease in tonic satiety hormones leptin and insulin are likely contributors to the coupling of energy expenditure with EI over time with voluntary exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".