Mesenchymal retinoic acid signaling is required for normal diaphragm development in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is characterized by incomplete formation of the diaphragm, causing herniation of the abdominal organs and subsequent lung hypoplasia; however, the etiology of CDH is poorly understood. The Retinoid Hypothesis posits that abnormal retinoic acid signaling leads to the formation of diaphragmatic hernias. Our goal is to better understand diaphragm development and the etiology of CDH. To achieve this goal, we first performed single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of the developing diaphragm, then generated a conditional retinoic acid receptor dominant negative knock-in to inhibit retinoic acid signaling in the mesenchyme of the developing diaphragm. Our single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed 10 distinct cell populations in the developing diaphragm, with mesenchymal cells being the primary expresser of CDH and retinoic acid signaling-related genes. Transgenic inhibition of mesenchymal retinoic acid signaling in the developing diaphragm caused hernias in 100% of embryos, recapitulating the hallmarks of CDH. Overall, our studies show that retinoic acid signaling in the mesenchymal component of the diaphragm is required for normal diaphragm development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".