MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407296032 · doi:10.1097/med.0000000000000903

An overview of persistent chylomicronemia: much more than meets the eye

2025· review· en· W4407296032 on OpenAlexaff
Miriam Larouche, Gerald F. Watts, Christie M. Ballantyne, Daniel Gaudet

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertriglyceridemiaLipoprotein lipaseMedicinePancreatitisAcute pancreatitisIntensive care medicineBioinformaticsBiologyInternal medicineTriglycerideCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of severe hypertriglyceridemia presenting in the form of chylomicronemia that persists despite treatment of secondary causes and the use of conventional lipid-lowering treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Persistent chylomicronemia is a rare syndromic disorder that affects carriers of bi-allelic combinations of pathogenic gene variants impairing lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, as well as a significant number of individuals who do not meet this genetic criterion. It is associated with a high risk of acute pancreatitis and other morbidities. Effective innovative treatments for severe hypertriglyceridemia are being developed and are becoming available. Patients with persistent chylomicronemia of any cause respond equally to next-generation therapies with LPL-independent mechanisms of action and do not generally respond to conventional LPL-dependent treatments. SUMMARY: Not all individuals with persistent chylomicronemia carry a proven pathogenic combination of gene variants that impair LPL activity. Documenting the clinical characteristics of people with persistent chylomicronemia and their response to emerging therapies is essential to correctly establish their risk trajectory and ensure equitable access to personalized treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and ObesitySame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207