Ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy have smaller bone area and deficits in trabecular microarchitecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a non-progressive neurological syndrome resulting in abnormal muscle tone, movement, and posture. It is unclear whether ambulatory children with CP have deficits in bone quantity or quality. Furthermore, the relationship between abnormal muscle tone, altered function, and bone health remains largely unexplored. This observational study investigated bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture in ambulatory children with spastic CP and associations of BMD with function, muscle spasticity, and gait. Children with spasticity in both lower limbs (n = 12) aged 3-8 years were recruited. Areal BMD was measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the proximal femur and lateral distal femur and compared to normative data. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) was performed at the metaphyseal tibia and radius in a subset of participants (n = 5) and compared to healthy children (n = 7). Gait pathology and cardiopulmonary function were investigated with the Gait Deviation Index, Edinburgh Visual Gait Score, and energy expenditure index. DXA areal BMD (aBMD) Z-scores at the lateral distal femur were within a normal range. However, the CP group's median aBMD Z-score at the proximal femur was -1.8 (IQR: -2.2, -1.2, p = .03) indicating potential skeletal fragility. Strong correlations were found between gait pathology and DXA-based bone outcomes (correlation coefficient 0.62 [p = .04] to 0.73 [p = .01]) as well as energy expenditure index and DXA-based bone outcomes (correlation coefficient -0.63 [p = .03] to -0.98 [p ≤ .001]). At the metaphyseal tibia, children with spastic CP had significant deficits in HR-pQCT-measured bone geometry and trabecular microarchitecture: 35% lower total area, 42% lower trabecular area, and 48% lower trabecular number than controls. HR-pQCT parameters were similar between groups at the metaphyseal radius. These differences in tibial metaphysis size and trabecular microarchitecture are similar to those observed in disuse and thus could be a result of abnormal biomechanics or low levels of physical activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".