MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407301930 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103073

Remote sensing-based spatiotemporal dynamics of agricultural drought on Prince Edward Island using Google Earth engine

2025· article· en· W4407301930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusDalhousie UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of GuelphUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Prince Edward IslandAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsAgricultureEarth (classical element)Dynamics (music)Remote sensingGeographyEarth observationEngineeringArchaeologySatelliteMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is a primary factor contributing to widespread drought conditions worldwide. Therefore, assessing agricultural drought's spatial and temporal extent is crucial. This study explicitly applies remote sensing techniques to monitor drought in the cropland area of Prince Edward Island, Canada, with a particular emphasis on potato crops. The long-term drought was evaluated using MODIS for 2012–2022, while the seasonal drought at the field scale was calculated using Landsat-8 OLI/TIRS for the 2021 and 2022 crop growth seasons. The computed remote sensing drought indices include Vegetation Condition Index (VCI), Vegetation Health Index (VHI), and Temperature Condition Index (TCI), which are derived using the Google Earth Engine platform. Examining long-term drought by MODIS revealed that 2020 was the most dominant drought year, according to all three drought indices. However, the seasonal variations of VCI, TCI, and VHI at the field scale observed in the three fields in 2021 and 2022 demonstrated that June went through considerable drought in both years. August was the second critical month following June for drought conditions. CHIRPS data indicated significant rainfall anomalies relative to the long-term seasonal average for the 2021 crop season, specifically in June (−38.5 %) and August (−38.2 %), while the rainfall in the crop season in 2022 exceeded the seasonal average. Based on Pearson correlation analysis, VHI correlated strongly with VCI (CC = 0.87 for 2021 and 0.93 for 2022) and moderately with rainfall (CC = 0.68 for 2021 and 0.63 for 2022). The spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed substantial positive autocorrelation of drought for 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. However, 2020 has the highest spatial autocorrelation, with Moran's I of 0.54 and a z-score of 24.8. Hence, this study will optimize irrigation, decrease crop loss, sustain crop yields, and enhance food security. • Remote sensing-derived drought indices were used to examine agricultural drought. • VCI, TCI and VHI were combined to investigate the seasonal and long-term droughts. • Utilized Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS and MODIS datasets to compute drought indices. • CHIRPS data was utilized to evaluate rainfall deviation from the long-term average. • Based on drought indices, 2020 was characterized by significant drought conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it