MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407303414 · doi:10.1063/5.0249240

Liouvillian solutions of the Klein–Gordon equation on D-dimensional de Sitter spacetime

2025· article· en· W4407303414 on OpenAlexafffund
C. L. Holder

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematical physicsKlein–Gordon equationSpacetimeDe Sitter universePhysicsDe Sitter spaceClassical mechanicsMathematicsUniverseQuantum mechanicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We apply the well known Kovacic algorithm to generate Liouvillian (i.e., closed-form) solutions to the ordinary differential equation that governs the radial part of the separable, coupled to scalar curvature, massive scalar wave equation on a D-dimensional de Sitter background spacetime. The radial equation is simply related to the famous hypergeometric equation, and our work is carried out in this general setting. We find several families of infinite sets of special parameter values for which Liouvillian solutions exist, and we demonstrate how to generate these solutions recursively. The solutions are related to hypergeometric polynomials and in some cases can be constructed explicitly. For some of the families, the Liouvillian solutions exactly satisfy the boundary conditions for quasinormal modes, a fundamental set of damped, outgoing wave-functions that depend only on the background spacetime and scalar field parameters. In these families we obtain agreement with published results on the scalar quasinormal modes of the pure de Sitter spacetime. For other families, we establish conjectures regarding the factorization of the parameter constraints required for existence of Liouvillian solutions. Our results are consistent with published results on the hypergeometric equation and the well known Pöschl–Teller equation. Our new contributions are to demonstrate how to generate the hypergeometric Liouvillian solutions recursively, to completely solve the quasinormal mode problem with Liouvillian solutions, and to analyze the Liouvillian parameter constraints for the hypergeometric equation, including the case of the physical de Sitter parameters. This work contributes new knowledge to the fields of special functions and general relativity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207