MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407303870 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314548

Patient-Reported Outcomes among people living with Chronic Pruritus (PROs-CP): Protocol for a single-center, multistage, mixed-methods prospective cohort study in Thailand

2025· article· en· W4407303870 on OpenAlexaff
Surapon Nochaiwong, Chidchanok Ruengorn, Salin Kiratikanon, Rujira Rujiwetpongstorn, Panjit Chieosilapatham, Napatra Tovanabutra, Siri Chiewchanvit, Ratanaporn Awiphan, Chabaphai Phosuya, Yongyuth Ruanta, Kednapa Thavorn, Mati Chuamanochan

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai University
KeywordsPsychosocialMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Observational studyCohort studyCohortProspective cohort studyHealth careGerontologyFamily medicinePsychiatrySurgeryNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although there have been well-validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in dermatology practice, there is limited evidence of the adopted comprehensive aspects of PRO measures in long-term follow-up among people living with chronic pruritus. As such, we aim to create a cohort study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes among people living with Chronic Pruritus (PROs-CP) in Thailand. METHODS AND DESIGN: This study is a single-center, prospective, open cohort, observational longitudinal study using a multistage, mixed-methods parallel designs to integrate both quantitative and qualitative data regarding PROs among people living with chronic pruritus (itch lasting six or more weeks). The multistage of the PROs-CP study will comprise three sub-studies: (i) study I, PROs measure development, translation, and psychometric validation; (ii) study II, perspectives of people living with chronic pruritus to gain more information regarding disease burden and unmet treatment care responses; and (iii) study III, a longitudinal study to assess the impact of chronic pruritus on long-term health outcomes. Based on a comprehensive review of a panel of stakeholders with chronic skin disease, a set of PRO measurement tools will comprise an established validated Thai version. Meanwhile, meaningful non-Thai versions or unestablished PRO instruments will be translated and developed through this study as appropriate. Quantitative data will be collected based on PRO measures regarding pruritus symptoms and severity, disease activity control and treatment satisfaction, general- and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life, mental health and psychosocial issues, and psychosomatic symptoms. Qualitative data will be obtained from the patient's perspectives through individual interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (MED-2566-0299), Thailand. Our findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSION: Regarding the mixed-methods approach, this open cohort, prospective longitudinal study will provide an evidence-based better understanding of patient perspectives on chronic pruritus burden and inform the utility of a comprehensive set of PROs to measure their long-term health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR, thaiclinicaltrials.org) registration TCTR20240327001 (registered on March 27, 2024).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicDermatology and Skin Diseases→French-language works237,207→