Patient-Reported Outcomes among people living with Chronic Pruritus (PROs-CP): Protocol for a single-center, multistage, mixed-methods prospective cohort study in Thailand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there have been well-validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in dermatology practice, there is limited evidence of the adopted comprehensive aspects of PRO measures in long-term follow-up among people living with chronic pruritus. As such, we aim to create a cohort study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes among people living with Chronic Pruritus (PROs-CP) in Thailand. METHODS AND DESIGN: This study is a single-center, prospective, open cohort, observational longitudinal study using a multistage, mixed-methods parallel designs to integrate both quantitative and qualitative data regarding PROs among people living with chronic pruritus (itch lasting six or more weeks). The multistage of the PROs-CP study will comprise three sub-studies: (i) study I, PROs measure development, translation, and psychometric validation; (ii) study II, perspectives of people living with chronic pruritus to gain more information regarding disease burden and unmet treatment care responses; and (iii) study III, a longitudinal study to assess the impact of chronic pruritus on long-term health outcomes. Based on a comprehensive review of a panel of stakeholders with chronic skin disease, a set of PRO measurement tools will comprise an established validated Thai version. Meanwhile, meaningful non-Thai versions or unestablished PRO instruments will be translated and developed through this study as appropriate. Quantitative data will be collected based on PRO measures regarding pruritus symptoms and severity, disease activity control and treatment satisfaction, general- and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life, mental health and psychosocial issues, and psychosomatic symptoms. Qualitative data will be obtained from the patient's perspectives through individual interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (MED-2566-0299), Thailand. Our findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSION: Regarding the mixed-methods approach, this open cohort, prospective longitudinal study will provide an evidence-based better understanding of patient perspectives on chronic pruritus burden and inform the utility of a comprehensive set of PROs to measure their long-term health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR, thaiclinicaltrials.org) registration TCTR20240327001 (registered on March 27, 2024).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".