MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407306921 · doi:10.7326/annals-24-02132

Bleeding Risks With Non–Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy

2025· review· en· W4407306921 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Ke Wang, Geethan Baskaran, Ghazal Razeghi, Richard Ma, Louis Park, Manasi Tannu, P J Devereaux, William F. McIntyre, Jeff S. Healey, Ashkan Shoamanesh, David Conen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsImpactUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVitamin kClopidogrelRivaroxabanMajor bleedingDabigatranInternal medicineAspirinAtrial fibrillationWarfarin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In several settings, therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior to aspirin for the prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. PURPOSE: To estimate differences in bleeding risks between NOACs and single antiplatelet therapy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2024 without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing therapeutic-dose NOACs versus single antiplatelet therapy, with a minimum treatment duration of 3 months. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was done independently and in duplicate. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine RCTs with 26 224 participants were included. All studies used aspirin as antiplatelet therapy. Compared with aspirin, apixaban had similar rates of major bleeding (risk difference [RD], 0.0 percentage point [95% CI, -1.3 to 2.6 percentage points]; 5 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, -0.2 percentage point [CI, -0.6 to 1.4 percentage points]; 5 trials). Compared with aspirin, dabigatran had similar rates of major bleeding (RD, 0.5 percentage point [CI, -2.1 to 19.6 percentage points]; 2 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, 0.0 percentage point [CI, -1.1 to 24.5 percentage points]; 2 trials). Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban had higher rates of major bleeding (RD, 0.9 percentage point [CI, -0.1 to 3.7 percentage points]; 2 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, 0.3 percentage point [CI, -0.1 to 79.7 percentage points]; 2 trials). The evidence certainty ranged from low to moderate. LIMITATION: Confidence intervals were wide and included the possibility of a null effect. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review of RCTs, rates of major bleeding for therapeutic-dose apixaban and dabigatran were similar to those for low-dose aspirin, whereas rates were higher for rivaroxaban. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42024553683).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.012
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Internal MedicineSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207