MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407307544

Modelo teórico, agentes, estrategias, duración, escenarios para la implementación, grado escolar e indicadores de resultados utilizados en los programas de promoción de la actividad física en el contexto escolar. Theoretical model, agents, strategies, duration, spaces of implementation, school grades and performance indicators, used in programs to promote physical activity in school context.

2011· article· es· W4407307544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelvin Diego Moposita Ortega, F. González, Fernando Daniel Farfán

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: El propósito del presente estudio es analizar el modelo teórico, agentes, estrategias, duración, escenarios de implementación, grado escolar e indicadores de resultados, utilizados en los programas de promoción de la actividad física en el contexto escolar desarrollados en el ámbito internacional en los últimos veinticinco años. Método: Se realizó una revisión de los diferentes estudios que desarrollaron programas de actividad física encaminada a la salud en el contexto escolar. Se utilizaron y combinaron diversas estrategias de búsqueda, manuales y electrónicas. Resultados: Siete estudios utilizaron modelos teóricos para el diseño de los programas. Los principales agentes involucrados en la implementación de los programas fueron los docentes de educación física (EF), y los estudiantes. El escenario para la implementación se ubicó básicamente en la clase de educación física. Las estrategias estaban dirigidas principalmente a modificar el currículo de las clases de EF. Las intervenciones se orientaron fundamentalmente a niños de escuela elemental. La duración variaba entre 1 y 12 meses. Los indicadores utilizados para verificar el impacto del programa fueron: incremento en la cantidad de AF, IMC, y peso corporal. La mayor parte de estos estudios se llevó a cabo en escuelas de Estados Unidos, Canadá, India, Reino Unido e Irán. Conclusiones: A pesar de los resultados positivos obtenidos en cada una de las intervenciones, se identificó heterogeneidad: en la metodología, población, actores involucrados e indicadores de eficacia, lo cual no permite realizar comparaciones entre los diferentes estudios. [Fernández JA, González M, Farfán M. Modelo teórico, agentes, estrategias, duración, escenarios para la implementación, grado escolar e indicadores de resultados, utilizados en los programas de promoción de la actividad física en el contexto escolar. MedUNAB 2011; 14:121-131]. ___________________________________________________Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the theoretical model, agents, strategies, duration, space of implementation, school grades and performance indicators, used in programs to promote physical activity in school context developed in the international arena on the past twenty five years. Method: It was made a review of different studies that developed physical activity programs aimed to health on school context. Were used and combined diverse search strategies, manual and electronic. Results: Seven studies used theoretical models for the design of programs. The main agents involved in the implementation of programs were the teachers of physical education (PE), and students. The space for implementation was located mainly in the physical education class. Strategies were directed to modify the curriculum of the physical education classes. Interventions were focused on children of elementary school. The duration ranged between 1 and 12 months. The indicators used to confirm the impact of the program were: increased in the amount of PA, BMI and body weight. Most of the studies were conducted in schools at United States, Canada, India, United Kingdom and Iran. Conclusions: Despite the positive results obtained in each of the interventions, heterogeneity was identified in: the methodology, population, involved actors and performance indicators, which does not allow comparisons between the different studies. [Fernández JA, González M, Farfán M. Theoretical model, agents, strategies, duration, spaces of implementation, school grades and performance indicators, used in programs to promote physical activity in school context. MedUNAB 2011; 14:121-131].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.603
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207