Use of omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation for treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias in two dogs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two dogs were referred to the same institution 4 months apart for cardiac evaluation due to respiratory symptoms and both were diagnosed with ventricular arrhythmias at the time of presentation. Case 1, an 11‐year‐old, male, neutered labrador retriever was diagnosed with degenerative valve disease, resulting in left‐sided congestive heart failure in addition to moderate severity ventricular arrhythmias. Case 2, an 8‐year‐old, female, spayed English bulldog was diagnosed with mild degenerative valve disease and moderate ventricular arrhythmias while receiving subtherapeutic sotalol that was initiated by another veterinarian before presentation. For both cases, antiarrhythmic therapy was adjusted several times over the course of several months based on Holter monitor results indicating inadequate arrhythmia control. Treatment included sotalol, mexiletine, amiodarone or a combination of these. The addition of omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation in both cases finally resulted in adequate arrhythmia control when previous antiarrhythmic medication adjustments had not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it