Outcomes after Acute Perilunate Injuries: A Single-Center Experience Over 30 Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Perilunate fracture-dislocations represent a spectrum of devastating wrist injuries. They typically involve high-energy mechanisms, occur in young patients and are relatively uncommon. Our current knowledge on this rare wrist pathology is limited as most studies involve small retrospective case series and limited follow-up. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional, radiographic, and patient reported outcomes after perilunate injuries and evaluate surgical practice trends over time. A retrospective review identified 123 patients who had open reduction and internal fixation of an acute perilunate injury at a single academic centre over a 30-year study period. Post-operative functional, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes were assessed. The association of various surgical and injury-related variables on outcomes was examined using independent t-tests and ANOVA testing, with post-hoc analysis. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Fourty-seven patients participated with a mean follow-up of 14 years. All patients underwent urgent or semi-urgent operative intervention with a dorsal or combined approach. At final follow-up, mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 24.2, visual analogue scale pain score was 2.4, flexion-extension arc was 56% of the contralateral side and grip strength was 76%. Patients who underwent re-operation or injured their dominant hand had worse outcomes. Only 9% of patients were unable to return to their same job or a similar job as a result of their injury. Overall, patients retain a relatively high level of function and report low pain scores long-term after perilunate injuries. Multi-centre, prospective studies are required going forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".