No Time for Remodulation: A PHY Steganographic Symbiotic Channel Over Constant Envelope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical layer steganography plays a key role in physical layer security. Yet most works are strongly modulation-sensitive and have to modify the modulation at the baseband. However, these methods cannot work with wireless devices whose baseband modulations cannot be software-defined. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose an analog solution that uses a symbiotic hardware component designed, called Pluggable Cloak, connecting to the radio frequency front end (RFFE) to establish a steganographic symbiotic channel (SSC) over constant envelope physical layer (CE-PHY) in 2.4GHz ISM band, such as Bluetooth, ZigBee and 802.11b Wi-Fi, to hide information. The advantage lies in enabling secure transmission of the deployed devices that are not software-defined with this pluggable hardware. Specifically, Pluggable Cloak analogously modulates the amplitude of CE-PHY, so that sensitive information can be securely sent to a customized receiver without being detected by regular CE receivers. To further protect hidden information from the detection of a malicious adversary, we propose methods to randomize the SSC. We develop a lightweight prototype to evaluate symbiosis, undetectability, and throughput. The results show that the symbol error rates (SERs) of the sensitive data received and regular CE data are lower than$10^{-5}$at the customized receiver. In contrast, the SER of the sensitive data is close to 1 in the adversary, confirming the effectiveness of the SSC technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".