MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407317465 · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3540290

No Time for Remodulation: A PHY Steganographic Symbiotic Channel Over Constant Envelope

2025· article· en· W4407317465 on OpenAlexaff
Jiahao Liu, Caihui Du, Jihong Yu, Jiangchuan Liu, Huan Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceConstant (computer programming)Channel (broadcasting)PHYEnvelope (radar)Frequency-shift keyingTelecommunicationsPhysical layerDemodulationWirelessRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical layer steganography plays a key role in physical layer security. Yet most works are strongly modulation-sensitive and have to modify the modulation at the baseband. However, these methods cannot work with wireless devices whose baseband modulations cannot be software-defined. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose an analog solution that uses a symbiotic hardware component designed, called Pluggable Cloak, connecting to the radio frequency front end (RFFE) to establish a steganographic symbiotic channel (SSC) over constant envelope physical layer (CE-PHY) in 2.4GHz ISM band, such as Bluetooth, ZigBee and 802.11b Wi-Fi, to hide information. The advantage lies in enabling secure transmission of the deployed devices that are not software-defined with this pluggable hardware. Specifically, Pluggable Cloak analogously modulates the amplitude of CE-PHY, so that sensitive information can be securely sent to a customized receiver without being detected by regular CE receivers. To further protect hidden information from the detection of a malicious adversary, we propose methods to randomize the SSC. We develop a lightweight prototype to evaluate symbiosis, undetectability, and throughput. The results show that the symbol error rates (SERs) of the sensitive data received and regular CE data are lower than <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$10^{-5}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> at the customized receiver. In contrast, the SER of the sensitive data is close to 1 in the adversary, confirming the effectiveness of the SSC technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecuritySame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207