MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407320512 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100886

Inside the journey: A qualitative study of intravenous ketamine therapy for treatment-resistant depression

2025· article· en· W4407320512 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsKetamineDepression (economics)Treatment-resistant depressionPsychiatryPsychotherapistPsychologyMedicineMajor depressive disorder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects many individuals and is challenging to treat. • Intravenous (IV) ketamine has shown quick antidepressant effects, but its long-term outcomes and patient experiences are not well studied. • This qualitative study in Saskatchewan interviewed 19 individuals living with TRD undergoing IV ketamine therapy. • Key findings include variable effects during treatment such as psychological relief and altered perceptions. • Participants reported significant improvements in mood, life outlook, and daily functioning. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects over 30 % of patients with depression and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Intravenous (IV) ketamine has shown rapid and robust antidepressant effects for TRD. However, limited data exist on long-term maintenance and patient experiences, especially in North America. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of individuals receiving IV ketamine for TRD in Saskatchewan, Canada. This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 19 individuals receiving IV ketamine at the Linden Medical Centre. Participants were included if they were over 18 years of age and received IV ketamine for TRD. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology to identify emerging themes. Key themes included the acute effects of ketamine during treatment, which varied among patients but generally involved psychological relief and altered perceptions. Participants noted significant improvements in mood, outlook on life, and daily functioning. However, barriers such as treatment cost, accessibility, and stigma were prevalent. Psychosocial factors and the clinic environment also substantially influenced treatment outcomes. The findings highlight the profound impact of IV ketamine on patients with TRD, emphasizing the importance of a supportive clinic environment and addressing barriers to accessibility. Despite the financial burden and limited accessibility, ketamine treatments resulted in meaningful improvements, including reduced suicidality. This study underscores the need for further research on individual predictors of ketamine response, cost-effectiveness, and educational materials to set realistic patient expectations. Understanding patient experiences can help optimize ketamine therapy for TRD, ultimately enhancing treatment outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it