Approaches to Speech Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The article analyzes methods of correcting speech disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). It is based on a literature review and practical cases on this issue. Methods: The study used observation methods of behavior, speech, and communication of children with ASD, questionnaires from parents, educators, and correctional teachers, and experimental research based on the information obtained. The main methods of correction of speech disorders in children with ASD are highlighted, which include speech therapy, alternative and augmentative communication (AAC), therapy using games and imitation techniques, the use of behavioral techniques, and multisensory approaches. Traditional and innovative means for implementing the outlined methods of correction of speech disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders are outlined. A methodology for determining the effectiveness of the use of methods for the correction of speech disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders is proposed. Results: Criteria and indicators for evaluating the outlined methods of correcting speech disorders have been developed. The main criteria include speech development, development of communication and social skills, reduction of stereotypical and repetitive forms of speech, emotional and behavioral regulation, use of alternative means of communication, and individual progress. Based on the developed criteria, a survey was conducted among parents, educators, and therapy specialists on the effectiveness of using the outlined methods of correcting speech disorders. The effectiveness of the use of traditional and innovative means of correction of speech disorders in the context of the implementation of the outlined methods of speech correction in children with ASD was experimentally tested. The effectiveness of the above methods was tested for different groups of children with ASD, including preschool, school, and adolescent age. In the course of the test, the control group used traditional means, and the experimental group used a combination of traditional and innovative means of correcting speech disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Conclusion: The positive influence of the combination of traditional and innovative means of correction of speech disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) on the development of language skills is noted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".