A Look at the New Developments in the European Union's Regulation on Crypto-Assets and Anti-Money Laundering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the recent developments in the European Union's regulation concerning crypto-assets. This regulation is evolving in a fragmented manner and by sectors, particularly focusing on markets and the financial sector in general, and does not have a defined perspective for a comprehensive regulation of the sector. It is a regulation that aims to introduce elements of public control over the actors in the system to regulate the markets and also in anticipation of future new instruments consisting of crypto-assets, introducing elements of public control entrusted to national authorities (notably Regulation 2023/1114 and 2022/858). Meanwhile, in order to enhance the fight against money laundering, elements of control and verification on intermediaries have been introduced as part of the AML Package (particularly with Regulation 2023/1113), imposing obligations on them and implementing control tools over end users, their identities, and their operations. National legal systems are gradually receiving these regulations and harmonizing with European Union law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it