MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407348740 · doi:10.2196/62935

Assessment of Digital Capabilities by 9 Countries in the Alliance for Healthy Cities Using AI: Cross-Sectional Analysis

2025· article· en· W4407348740 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hocheol Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsDigital healthPython (programming language)SustainabilityPolitical scienceEngineeringBusinessHealth careComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978 initiated a global focus on universal health, supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) through healthy cities policies. The concept emerged at the 1984 Toronto "Beyond Health Care" conference, leading to WHO's first pilot project in Lisbon in 1986. The WHO continues to support regional healthy city networks, emphasizing digital transformation and data-driven health management in the digital era. Objective: This study explored the capabilities of digital healthy cities within the framework of digital transformation, focusing on member countries of the Asian Forum of Healthy Cities. It examined the cities' preparedness and policy needs for transitioning to digital health. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of 9 countries-Australia, Cambodia, China, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, the Philippines, and Vietnam-from August 1 to September 21, 2023. The 6-section SPIRIT (setting approach and sustainability; political commitment, policy, and community participation; information and innovation; resources and research; infrastructure and intersectoral; and training) checklist was modified to assess healthy cities' digital capabilities. With input from 3 healthy city experts, the checklist was revised for digital capabilities, renaming "healthy city" to "digital healthy city." The revised tool comprises 8 sections with 33 items. The survey leveraged ChatGPT (version 4.0; OpenAI, Microsoft), accessed via Python (Python Software Foundation) application programming interface. The openai library was installed, and an application programming interface key was entered to use ChatGPT (version 4.0). The "GPT-4 Turbo" model command was applied. A qualitative analysis of the collected data was conducted by 5 healthy city experts through group deep-discussions. Results: The results indicate that these countries should establish networks and committees for sustainable digital healthy cities. Cambodia showed the lowest access to electricity (70%) and significant digital infrastructure disparities. Efforts to sustain digital health initiatives varied, with countries such as Korea focusing on telemedicine, while China aimed to build a comprehensive digital health database, highlighting the need for tailored strategies in promoting digital healthy cities. Life expectancy was the highest in the Republic of Korea and Japan (both 84 y). Access to electricity was the lowest in Cambodia (70%) with the remaining countries having had 95% or higher access. The internet use rate was the highest in Malaysia (97.4%), followed by the Republic of Korea (97.2%), Australia (96.2%), and Japan (82.9%). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of big data-driven policies and personal information protection systems. Collaborative efforts across sectors for effective implementation of digital healthy cities. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of digital healthy cities is diminished without adequate digital literacy among managers and users, suggesting the need for policies to improve digital literacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.267
GPT teacher head0.608
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education→French-language works237,207→