MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Особливості використання інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій у педагогічній освіті канади

2015· article· uk· W4407352499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ірина Демченко

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Educational Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

У статті вивчено низку вітчизняних досліджень, присвячених вищій, включаючи педагогічну, освіті в Канаді, виявлено їхню основну проблематику, зокрема: інформатизація освіти, мультикультуралізм, інноваційні педагогічні технології, неперервна освіта учителів, педагогічна майстерність, індивідуалізація навчального процесу, тенденції розвитку вищої педагогічної освіти тощо. Досліджено історичні витоки використання інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій в освіті Канади. Розглянуто специфіку терміну «технологія» залежно від визначення, що його супроводжує (Educational Technology, Teaching and Learning Technology, Instructional Technology, Pedagogical Technology, Interactive Technology, Information Technology та Information and Communication Technology). Здійснено критичний аналіз канадських досліджень з проблеми сутності інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій та їх основних видів. Проаналізовано сучасний стан впровадження інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій (ІКТ) у педагогічну освіту Канади. Вивчено особливості використання таксономії Б. Блума засобами ІКТ у навчальному середовищі. Наведено класифікацію ІКТ залежно від їх функціонального навантаження та приклади найбільш вживаних засобів ІКТ у підготовці учителів.В статье изучен ряд отечественных исследований, посвященных высшему, включая педагогическое, образованию Канады, выявлена их основная проблематика: информатизация образования, мультикультурализм, инновационные педагогические технологии, непрерывное образование учителей, педагогическое мастерство, индивидуализация учебного процесса, тенденции развития высшего педагогического образования и т.д. Исследованы исторические истоки использования информационно-коммуникационных технологий в образовании Канады. Осуществлен критический анализ канадских исследований по проблеме сущности информационно-коммуникационных технологий и их основных видов. Рассмотрена специфика термина «технология» в зависимости от определения, которое используется наряду с ним (Educational technology, Teaching and Learning technology, Instructional technology, Pedagogical technology, Interactive technology, Information technology и Information and communication technology). Проанализировано современное состояние внедрения информационно-коммуникационных технологий в педагогическое образование Канады. Изучены некоторые аспекты использования таксономии Б. Блума средствами ИКТ в учебной среде. Приведены классификация ИКТ в зависимости от их функциональной нагрузки и примеры наиболее употребляемых средств ИКТ в учебной деятельности.The analysis of the scientific and educational literature is presented, and it showed that higher education in Canada attracts the attention of many researchers. This is a consequence of quality training of future teachers. It was found that the Ukrainian science has a significant amount of researches concerned the nature of ICT, but does not actually investigate their effectiveness in teacher training.A number of domestic researches concerned on higher education, including teacher education of Canada are studied; their main problems are identified: the computerization of education, multiculturalism, innovative educational technologies, life-long education of teachers, pedagogical skills, individualization of the learning process, the development trends in higher teacher education, etc. Historical facts of information and communication technologies’implementation in Canadian education are studied. A critical analysis of Canadian researches concerned the definition of information and communication technologies and their major species are carried out. The specificity of the term "technology" according to the definition that is used is researched (Educational technology, Teaching and Learning technology, Instructional technology, Pedagogical technology, Interactive technology, Information technology and Information and communication technology). The current situation of information and communication technologies use in teacher education in Canada is studied. Some aspects of using B. Bloom’s taxonomy in the educational environment are presented. A classification of ICT according to their functional load and the most frequently used tools of ICT in learning activities are researched.The most popular tools of ICT used by teachers are Google Education, Skype, Wikispace, Edmodo, Twitter, Dropbox, Galileo Educational Network, Clicker and others. The educational process on Canadian educational faculties is almost always accompanied by the use of ICT. Any project, practical work or simply learning of new material is designed to answer modern requirements for graduates of pedagogical universities in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogySame topicInnovative Educational TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207