MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407355081 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452871

Mapping the Milky Way with Gaia Bp/Rp spectra

2025· article· en· W4407355081 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xianhao Ye, Wenbo Wu, Carlos Allende Prieto, David S. Aguado, Jingkun Zhao, J. I. Gónzalez Hernández, R. Rébolo, Gang Zhao, Zhuohan Li, C. del Burgo, Yuqin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikChina Scholarship CouncilMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale University
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WayAstrophysicsStarsFlux (metallurgy)AstronomySpectral lineSystematic error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Gaia Bp/Rp spectrophotometry for over two hundred million stars has been publicly released as part of Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3). These data have great potential for mapping metallicity across the Milky Way. Several recent studies have analyzed this data set to derive atmospheric parameters and identify new metal-poor stars. In addition, systematics in the fluxes of the Bp/Rp spectra have also been identified and characterized. Aims. We aim to construct an alternative catalog of atmospheric parameters from Gaia Bp/Rp spectra by fitting them with synthetic spectra based on model atmospheres, and provide corrections to the Bp/Rp fluxes according to stellar colors, magnitudes, and interstellar extinction. Methods. We use GaiaXPy to obtain calibrated spectra and apply FERЯ to match the corrected Bp/Rp spectra with models and infer atmospheric parameters. We train a neural network (NN) using stars in the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) to predict flux corrections as a function of wavelength for each target. Results. Based on the comparison with APOGEE parameters, we conclude that our estimated parameters have systematic errors and uncertainties in Teff, log g, and [M/H] about −38 ± 167 K, 0.05 ± 0.40 dex, and −0.12 ± 0.19 dex, respectively, for stars in the range 4000 ≤ Teff ≤ 7000 K. The corrected Bp/Rp spectra show improved agreement with both models and Hubble Space Telescope (HST) CALSPEC data. Our correction increases the precision of the relative spectrophotometry of the Bp/Rp data from 3.2–3.7% to 1.2–2.4%. We also compare our results with other similar catalogs from the literature and validate them using star clusters. Finally, we have built a catalog of atmospheric parameters for stars within 4000 ≤ Teff ≤ 7000 K, comprising 68 394 431 sources, along with a subset of 124 188 stars with [M/H] ≤ −2.5. Our catalogs and flux correction code are publicly available. Conclusions. Our results confirm that the Gaia Bp/Rp flux calibrated spectra show systematic patterns as a function of wavelength that are tightly related to colors, magnitudes, and extinction. Our optimization algorithm can give us accurate atmospheric parameters of stars with a clear and direct link to models of stellar atmospheres, and can be used to efficiently search for extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→