MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407357250 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1791836

Patellofemoral Instability: Preoperative Considerations and Postoperative Imaging

2025· review· en· W4407357250 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Atinga, David Wasserstein, Sebastian Tomescu, Linda Probyn

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedial patellofemoral ligamentOsteotomyPatellaOsteoarthritisInstabilityValgusCoronal planePatellofemoral jointPhysical examinationSurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patellofemoral instability is common, often affecting young female patients. It contributes to significant morbidity, such as pain and premature osteoarthritis. Patient presentation varies, from acute instability events to chronic/recurrent instability. This article provides a detailed description of the anatomy and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and relates it to the pathology of patellofemoral instability. There are well-recognized predisposing anatomical factors, such as trochlear morphology, patella height, excessive lateralization of the tibial tubercle, excessive valgus alignment, and femoral or tibial torsion.Diagnosis of patellofemoral instability requires a thorough clinical history and physical examination, combined with a multimodality imaging approach. Imaging is useful in surgical planning to define the severity of predisposing anatomical factors and to detect postoperative complications. The operative management of patellofemoral instability targets predisposing anatomical factors, such as medial stabilizing ligament reconstruction or repair, tibial tubercle osteotomy, femoral trochleoplasty, coronal plane realignment osteotomy, and torsional osteotomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Musculoskeletal RadiologySame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207