MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407367532 · doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103379

On the proper integration of pre-heating tanks in ground source heat pump systems combined with photovoltaic-thermal panels

2025· article· en· W4407367532 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammad Liravi, Ehsan Karkon, Yanjun Dai, Laurent Georges

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science and Engineering Progress · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges ForskningsrådMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanNational Research Council CanadaNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
KeywordsHeat pumpPhotovoltaic systemThermalEnvironmental scienceNuclear engineeringThermal energy storageAir source heat pumpsMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringHeat exchangerPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Pre-heating tanks are investigated to improve the system efficiency. • Pre-heating tank performance depends on the initial borehole field size. • Pre-heating tank is more beneficial for buildings with higher insulation levels. • Pre-heating tanks boost energy efficiency and cut costs in PVT + GSHP systems. Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) systems are an energy-efficient solution for meeting heating demands in buildings. However, in cold climates with heating-dominated loads, the net extraction of heat from the ground causes a thermal imbalance, reducing ground temperature and the seasonal performance factor (SPF) of the heat pump over time. Photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) panels can help regenerate ground temperature, improving energy efficiency and potentially reducing the required borehole field size. While the scientific literature has recently clarified the design and potential of GSHP + PVT, limited research has been done on the use of pre-heating tanks to improve the system performance. This study evaluates three GSHP + PVT system layouts using TRNSYS simulations for a multi-family house in Oslo over a 50-year period. The results show that integrating a pre-heating tank on the condenser side increases the 50-year-averaged system SPF 4 from 3.85 (baseline) to 4.11 (+6.8 %), demonstrating enhanced energy efficiency. However, the SPF 4 reduction over time is larger with the pre-heating tank (−7.47 %) due to reduced ground regeneration. In contrast, placing the pre-heating tank on the evaporator side yields a moderate SPF 4 increase to 3.95 (+2.6 %). Additionally, the optimal configurations lead to a 3.6 % reduction in electricity import from the grid, while the impact on PVT electricity generation remains minimal. These findings highlight that pre-heating tanks can effectively enhance GSHP + PVT efficiency, but their placement must be carefully considered to balance short-term efficiency gains with long-term performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal Science and Engineering ProgressSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207