Cosmic velocity, density, and halo mass function: Insights from deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We discuss an implementation of a deep learning framework to gain insight into dark matter (DM) structure formation. We investigate the contribution of velocity and density field information to the construction of the halo mass function (HMF) in cosmological $N$-body simulations. We train a convolutional neural network (CNN) on the initial snapshot of a DM-only simulation to predict the halo mass that individual particles fall into at $z=0$, in the halo mass range of $10.5<\mathrm{log}(M/{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}})<14$. We show that for the standard $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology with amplitude of initial perturbations ${A}_{s}=2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}$, the initial velocity and density fields have equivalent information, as expected in the linear regime, and manifest the power of our CNN to diagnose the redundant information. To investigate the nonlinear effects, we increase the initial power spectrum. In the linear regime, this is equivalent to decreasing the initial redshift. The CNN model trained on the simulation snapshots with large ${A}_{s}$ shows a considerable improvement in the HMF prediction when adding the velocity field information. Using our CNN map without further physical assumptions, we precisely evaluate when these nonlinear effects become vital. Eventually, for the simulation with ${A}_{s}=8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$, the model trained with only density information shows at least an 80% increase in the mean squared error relative to the model with both velocity and density information. Our work shows the interpretability and ability of CNNs to read higher-order information from simple images, making them an excellent tool for cosmological studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".