MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407373093 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3540868

Accountable Distributed Access Control With Privacy Preservation for Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Things Systems: A Zero-Trust Security Scheme

2025· article· en· W4407373093 on OpenAlexaff
He Fang, Li Xu, Guoshun Nan, Danyang Zheng, Haitao Zhao, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBlockchainComputer scienceComputer securityScheme (mathematics)Access controlInternet of ThingsInternet privacyZero-knowledge proofThe InternetComputer networkCryptographyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While being able to avoid single point failures, emerging decentralized security techniques are facing new challenges of reliability, robustness, and privacy preservation in blockchain-enabled Internet of Things (IoT) systems. To circumvent these issues, a zero-trust security scheme is proposed through distributed access control, enhanced authentication, dynamic authorization, and privacy preservation enabled by the consortium blockchain. The proposed scheme integrates three key components, i.e., a distributed recommendation mechanism, where multiple authorized nodes are utilized as referrers to efficiently confer their trust on a new public entity for enhanced authentication; an anonymous credential generation strategy, which is developed for the new entity to further protect its privacy from linking attacks; and an adaptive reputation update strategy, which is proposed for evaluating the nodes’ behaviors in the system for accountability and dynamic multiple-level authorization. The proposed scheme is implemented in a Hyperledge Fabric and the results show that it significantly enhances security and protects private information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207