Accountable Distributed Access Control With Privacy Preservation for Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Things Systems: A Zero-Trust Security Scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While being able to avoid single point failures, emerging decentralized security techniques are facing new challenges of reliability, robustness, and privacy preservation in blockchain-enabled Internet of Things (IoT) systems. To circumvent these issues, a zero-trust security scheme is proposed through distributed access control, enhanced authentication, dynamic authorization, and privacy preservation enabled by the consortium blockchain. The proposed scheme integrates three key components, i.e., a distributed recommendation mechanism, where multiple authorized nodes are utilized as referrers to efficiently confer their trust on a new public entity for enhanced authentication; an anonymous credential generation strategy, which is developed for the new entity to further protect its privacy from linking attacks; and an adaptive reputation update strategy, which is proposed for evaluating the nodes’ behaviors in the system for accountability and dynamic multiple-level authorization. The proposed scheme is implemented in a Hyperledge Fabric and the results show that it significantly enhances security and protects private information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".